From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CellSpin Soft, Inc. v. Panasonic Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Oct 14, 2022
No. 2020-1948 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2020-1948

10-14-2022

CELLSPIN SOFT, INC., Appellant v. PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, GOPRO, INC., GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARMIN USA, INC., Appellees KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor

RANDALL T. GARTEISER, Garteiser Honea, PLLC, Tyler, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL SCOTT FULLER, CHRISTOPHER A. HONEA; KIRK ANDERSON, Budo Law PC, Arvada, CO; PETER JOSEPH CORCORAN, III, Corcoran IP Law PLLC, Texarkana, TX. MELANIE L. BOSTWICK, Orrick, Herrington &Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellees. Appellees Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America also represented by T. VANN PEARCE, JR. KARINEH KHACHATOURIAN, KXT Law, LLP, Redwood City, CA, for appellee GoPro, Inc. JENNIFER C. BAILEY, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, for appellees Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA, Inc. Also represented by ADAM PRESCOTT SEITZ. JOSHUA K. HANDELL, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by BRIAN M. BOYNTON, MELISSA N. PATTERSON; SARAH E. CRAVEN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-00131.

RANDALL T. GARTEISER, Garteiser Honea, PLLC, Tyler, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL SCOTT FULLER, CHRISTOPHER A. HONEA; KIRK ANDERSON, Budo Law PC, Arvada, CO; PETER JOSEPH CORCORAN, III, Corcoran IP Law PLLC, Texarkana, TX.

MELANIE L. BOSTWICK, Orrick, Herrington &Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellees. Appellees Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America also represented by T. VANN PEARCE, JR.

KARINEH KHACHATOURIAN, KXT Law, LLP, Redwood City, CA, for appellee GoPro, Inc.

JENNIFER C. BAILEY, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, for appellees Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA, Inc. Also represented by ADAM PRESCOTT SEITZ.

JOSHUA K. HANDELL, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by BRIAN M. BOYNTON, MELISSA N. PATTERSON; SARAH E. CRAVEN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM

(LOURIE, TARANTO, and STARK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

CellSpin Soft, Inc. v. Panasonic Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Oct 14, 2022
No. 2020-1948 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2022)
Case details for

CellSpin Soft, Inc. v. Panasonic Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CELLSPIN SOFT, INC., Appellant v. PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 14, 2022

Citations

No. 2020-1948 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2022)