From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CellSpin Soft, Inc. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Oct 14, 2022
No. 2020-1947 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2020-1947

10-14-2022

CELLSPIN SOFT, INC., Appellant v. CANON U.S.A., INC., GOPRO, INC., GARMIN IN- TERNATIONAL, INC., GARMIN USA, INC., Appellees KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PA- TENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor

RANDALL T. GARTEISER, Garteiser Honea, PLLC, Tyler, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL SCOTT FULLER, CHRISTOPHER A. HONEA; KIRK ANDERSON, Budo Law PC, Arvada, CO; PETER JOSEPH CORCORAN, III, Corcoran IP Law PLLC, Texarkana, TX. JARED WESTON NEWTON, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &Sullivan, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellees. Appellee Canon U.S.A., Inc. also represented by RYAN SETH GOLDSTEIN, Los Angeles, CA. KARINEH KHACHATOURIAN, KXT Law, LLP, Redwood City, CA, for appellee GoPro, Inc. JENNIFER C. BAILEY, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, for appellees Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA, Inc. Also represented by ADAM PRESCOTT SEITZ. JOSHUA K. HANDELL, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by BRIAN M. BOYNTON, MELISSA N. PATTERSON; SARAH E. CRAVEN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-00127.

RANDALL T. GARTEISER, Garteiser Honea, PLLC, Tyler, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL SCOTT FULLER, CHRISTOPHER A. HONEA; KIRK ANDERSON, Budo Law PC, Arvada, CO; PETER JOSEPH CORCORAN, III, Corcoran IP Law PLLC, Texarkana, TX.

JARED WESTON NEWTON, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &Sullivan, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellees. Appellee Canon U.S.A., Inc. also represented by RYAN SETH GOLDSTEIN, Los Angeles, CA.

KARINEH KHACHATOURIAN, KXT Law, LLP, Redwood City, CA, for appellee GoPro, Inc.

JENNIFER C. BAILEY, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, for appellees Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA, Inc. Also represented by ADAM PRESCOTT SEITZ.

JOSHUA K. HANDELL, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by BRIAN M. BOYNTON, MELISSA N. PATTERSON; SARAH E. CRAVEN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM

(LOURIE, TARANTO, and STARK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

CellSpin Soft, Inc. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Oct 14, 2022
No. 2020-1947 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2022)
Case details for

CellSpin Soft, Inc. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CELLSPIN SOFT, INC., Appellant v. CANON U.S.A., INC., GOPRO, INC., GARMIN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 14, 2022

Citations

No. 2020-1947 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2022)