Opinion
1419 CA 18–00670
08-22-2019
In the Matter of Ross M. CELLINO, Jr., Petitioner–Respondent, v. CELLINO & BARNES, P.C., and Stephen E. Barnes, Respondents-Appellants. (Appeal No. 2.)
DUKE HOLZMAN PHOTIADIS & GRESENS LLP, BUFFALO (GREGORY P. PHOTIADIS OF COUNSEL), AND LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, FOR RESPONDENTS–APPELLANTS. CONNORS LLP, BUFFALO (TERRENCE M. CONNORS OF COUNSEL), AND HODGSON RUSS LLP, FOR PETITIONER–RESPONDENT.
DUKE HOLZMAN PHOTIADIS & GRESENS LLP, BUFFALO (GREGORY P. PHOTIADIS OF COUNSEL), AND LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, FOR RESPONDENTS–APPELLANTS.
CONNORS LLP, BUFFALO (TERRENCE M. CONNORS OF COUNSEL), AND HODGSON RUSS LLP, FOR PETITIONER–RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Cellino v. Cellino & Barnes, P.C. ( [appeal No. 1]—AD3d—[Aug. 22, 2019] [4th Dept 2019] ).