Opinion
383 CA 17–02195
03-22-2019
CELLINO & BARNES, P.C., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Brian Chapin YORK, Defendant–Appellant. (Appeal No. 1.)
BRIAN CHAPIN YORK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE. CELLINO & BARNES, P.C., BUFFALO (GREGORY V. PAJAK OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT.
BRIAN CHAPIN YORK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.
CELLINO & BARNES, P.C., BUFFALO (GREGORY V. PAJAK OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v. Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 A.D.2d 988, 988, 529 N.Y.S.2d 658 [4th Dept. 1988] ; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Roberts & Roberts, 63 A.D.2d 566, 567, 404 N.Y.S.2d 608 [1st Dept. 1978] ; see also CPLR 5501[a][1] ).