From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cellini v. Derespiris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 2003
302 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-02961, 2002-04860

Argued January 10, 2003.

February 13, 2003.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), dated February 20, 2002, as granted that branch of the oral application of the defendant Louis Derespiris which was to dismiss the claim alleging malicious prosecution insofar as it was asserted against him, and (2) an order of the same court, dated March 27, 2002, as granted that branch of the oral application of the defendants Thomas Gleason and the City of Mount Vernon which was to dismiss the same claim insofar as asserted against them.

McGovern, Connelly Davidson, New Rochelle, N.Y. (Frank H. Connelly, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Worth Longworth Bamundo London, New York, N.Y. (Gregory M. Longworth and John W. Burns of counsel), for respondent Louis Derespiris.

Helen M. Blackwood, Acting Corporation Counsel, Mount Vernon, N.Y. (Martino Weiss [Douglas J. Martino] of counsel), for respondents Thomas Gleason and City of Mount Vernon.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

An order that determines a motion that was not made on notice is not appealable as of right (CPLR 5701[a][2]; [c]; Blasie v. County of Westchester, 169 A.D.2d 697; Nicolini v. Carvel Corp., 142 A.D.2d 633). In this case, the orders decided motions which were not made on notice and we decline to grant leave to appeal. Further, we note that although this action was commenced in 1996, when the former CPLR 306-b was in effect, an examination of the Supreme Court file fails to disclose that the plaintiff filed the required proof of service.

FLORIO, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, FRIEDMANN and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cellini v. Derespiris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 2003
302 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Cellini v. Derespiris

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT A. CELLINI, appellant, v. LOUIS DERESPIRIS, ET AL., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 13, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
754 N.Y.S.2d 576

Citing Cases

Walsh v. Town of Brookhaven

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs. An order which does not determine a motion made on notice…

Delgado v. Delgado

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal as of right lies from an…