Opinion
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-375-RS-CJK
03-18-2013
ORDER
The relief requested in Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference (Doc. 7) is GRANTED. Good cause exists to permit expedited discovery in copyright infringement cases where Plaintiff (1) makes a prima facie showing on infringement, (2) there is no other way to identify the Doe Defendants, and (3) there is a risk an ISP will destroy its logs prior to the conference. See UMG Recording, Inc. v. Doe, 2008 WL 4104214, at *4 (N.D. Cal. 2008); Arista Records, LLC v. Does 1-19, 551 F.Supp.2d. 1, 6-7 (D.D.C. 2008). Plaintiff has shown that there is good cause to take discovery prior to the Rule 26(f) Conference. Plaintiff is granted leave to issue Rule 45 subpoenas to the ISPs identified as of this date, and those it identifies in the future, so that the ISPs can divulge the true name, address, telephone number, e-mail address, and MAC address of each Doe Defendant.
_______________
RICHARD SMOAK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE