From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Celentano v. Sacramento Regional Transit District

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 28, 2011
CIV S-11-1881 KJM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

CIV S-11-1881 KJM CKD PS.

September 28, 2011


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed August 26, 2011, this court, finding that plaintiff made an inadequate showing of indigence in her in forma pauperis affidavit, directed plaintiff within twenty days to submit the appropriate filing fee. That time period has now passed, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Celentano v. Sacramento Regional Transit District

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 28, 2011
CIV S-11-1881 KJM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Celentano v. Sacramento Regional Transit District

Case Details

Full title:GEORGIA CELENTANO, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

CIV S-11-1881 KJM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)