From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Celentano v. Armfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 1975
48 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

June 16, 1975


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Sylvestri Armfield appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated December 17, 1974, as granted the branch of a motion by plaintiff which was to vacate a previous order, made on default, dismissing the action for want of prosecution. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements, and said branch of plaintiff's motion denied, without prejudice to renewal on proper papers. In support of the motion under review, plaintiff was required to show both (1) a meritorious cause of action and (2) a reasonable excuse for the neglect in prosecution and the delay in making the motion (Prokop v City of New York, 9 A.D.2d 788). Plaintiff's moving papers were inadequate in both respects. Benjamin, Acting P.J., Rabin, Hopkins, Latham and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Celentano v. Armfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 1975
48 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Celentano v. Armfield

Case Details

Full title:JAMES R. CELENTANO, Respondent, v. BEVERLY ARMFIELD, Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1975

Citations

48 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

See my dissent in People v Junco ( 43 A.D.2d 266, affd 35 N.Y.2d 419), where the least culpable of three…