From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Celebrity Club v. Utah Liquor Control Commission

Supreme Court of Utah
Dec 14, 1982
657 P.2d 1292 (Utah 1982)

Opinion

No. 17887.

December 14, 1982.

Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County, Homer F. Wilkinson, J.

James A. McIntyre, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., John S. McAllister, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.


Defendant Utah Liquor Control Commission revoked plaintiff's state liquor store lease and plaintiff sought relief in the district court in the form of a preliminary injunction preventing defendant from enforcing its revocation order. The district court declined relief in light of the provision of U.C.A., 1953, § 32-1-32.6 which deprives the district courts of jurisdiction in such matters. The central issue on appeal bears upon the constitutionality of the statutory restriction upon the district court's jurisdiction.

The companion case of Celebrity Club Incorporated, dba The Gatsby v. Utah Liquor Control Commission, 657 P.2d 1293, also decided this day, upholds the constitutionality of that portion of the statute in question which deprives all courts, other than this Court, of jurisdiction to review the actions of the defendant Commission. The decision in that case is dispositive, and the reader is referred thereto for the Court's reasoning.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. No costs awarded.

STEWART, OAKS, HOWE and DURHAM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Celebrity Club v. Utah Liquor Control Commission

Supreme Court of Utah
Dec 14, 1982
657 P.2d 1292 (Utah 1982)
Case details for

Celebrity Club v. Utah Liquor Control Commission

Case Details

Full title:CELEBRITY CLUB INCORPORATED, DBA THE GATSBY, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, v…

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Dec 14, 1982

Citations

657 P.2d 1292 (Utah 1982)

Citing Cases

Celebrity Club Inc. v. Utah Liquor Control Com'n

See U.C.A., 1953, § 16-6-13.1(6). 657 P.2d 1292, also decided today by this Court. U.C.A., 1953, §…