Opinion
2:22-cv-00011-JCM-NJK
01-25-2022
Shirley Celcis, Plaintiff, v. Prog Leasing, LLC, Defendant.
BALLARD SPAHR LLP David E. Chavez Attorney for Defendant Prog Leasing, LLC KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC David Krieger, Esq. Shawn Miller, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff
BALLARD SPAHR LLP David E. Chavez Attorney for Defendant Prog Leasing, LLC
KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC David Krieger, Esq. Shawn Miller, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PROG LEASING, LLC TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
(FIRST REQUEST)
Defendant Prog Leasing, LLC's response to Plaintiff Shirley Celcis's Complaint (ECF No. 1) is currently due January 26, 2022. Prog Leasing has requested, and Plaintiff has agreed to, an extension of this response deadline up to and including February 9, 2022, to provide time for Prog Leasing to investigate Plaintiff's allegations and prepare a response. The parties agree that there is good cause for this extension.
[Continued on following page.]
This is the first request for an extension, and it is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
Order
On the basis of good cause, IT IS ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant Prog Leasing, LLC to respond to Plaintiff Shirley Celcis's complaint is extended up to and including February 9, 2022.