From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cejas v. Blanas

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 5, 2009
No. CIV S-05-1799 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1799 LKK GGH P.

November 5, 2009


ORDER


On October 14, 2009, the undersigned recommended that defendant's summary judgment motion be granted. On October 26, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion to amend the judgment. On that date, plaintiff filed a motion to file an appeal from any order denying his motion to amend the judgment.

Because no judgment has been entered, plaintiff's motion to amend the judgment is improper. If plaintiff disagrees with the findings and recommendations, he should file objections. Accordingly, the motion to amend the judgment is denied. Plaintiff does not require court permission to file a notice of appeal.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion to amend the judgment (no. 96) and motion for leave to file an appeal (no. 97) are denied;

2. Plaintiff is granted twenty-one days from the date of this order to file objections to the findings and recommendations.


Summaries of

Cejas v. Blanas

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 5, 2009
No. CIV S-05-1799 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2009)
Case details for

Cejas v. Blanas

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW A. CEJAS, Plaintiff, v. LOU BLANAS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 5, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1799 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2009)