From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cejas v. Blanas

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 13, 2008
No. CIV S-05-1799 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1799 LKK GGH P.

May 13, 2008


ORDER


On March 28, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the court order the deposition of defendant Oreschak or appoint counsel to take the deposition. The court has separately issued an order denying plaintiff's March 10, 2008, motion for appointment of counsel.

It appears that plaintiff may be requesting that the court waive the fees associated with a deposition so that plaintiff, who is proceeding in forma pauperis, may take the deposition. "Expenditure of public funds [on behalf of an indigent litigant] is proper only when authorized by Congress . . ." United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 321, 96 S.Ct. 2086 (1976). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), plaintiff's in forma pauperis status entitled him to a waiver of the filing fee and free services of process by the United States Marshal, but it does not entitle him to waiver of witness fees, mileage or deposition officer fees.See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Tedder v. Odel, 890 F.2d 210, 211 (9th Cie. 1989).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's March 28, 2008, motion for the deposition of defendant Oreschak is denied.


Summaries of

Cejas v. Blanas

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 13, 2008
No. CIV S-05-1799 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2008)
Case details for

Cejas v. Blanas

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW A. CEJAS, Plaintiff, v. LOU BLANAS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 13, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1799 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2008)