From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cedillo v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 20, 1968
391 F.2d 607 (9th Cir. 1968)

Opinion

No. 21137.

February 20, 1968.

Roger Sullivan, San Jose, Cal., for appellant Juvera.

Patrick Cedillo, in pro per.

James E. Shekoyan (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty. William M. Byrne, Jr., U.S. Atty., Robert L. Brosio, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before HAMLIN, MERRILL, and ELY, Circuit Judges.


Appellants were convicted under an indictment charging them with having unlawfully possessed an unregistered firearm, an offense proscribed by 26 U.S.C. § 5851. Prior to their trial, they moved that the indictment be dismissed. They based their motion upon the claim that enforcement of the cited statute would infringe upon their constitutional rights against required self-incrimination. It has now been established that their motion, denied by the District Court, should have been granted. Haynes v. United States, 390 U.S. 85, 88 Sup.Ct. 722, 19 L.Ed.2d 923 (1968).

Upon remand, the indictment will be dismissed.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Cedillo v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 20, 1968
391 F.2d 607 (9th Cir. 1968)
Case details for

Cedillo v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Patrick R. CEDILLO and Benito Juvera, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 20, 1968

Citations

391 F.2d 607 (9th Cir. 1968)

Citing Cases

DePugh v. United States

The Government also concedes that Count III must be reversed and remanded with directions to dismiss this…