From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cecil v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 15, 2011
373 P.3d 902 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 58237.

07-15-2011

Brandon Richard CECIL, Petitioner, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF the STATE of Nevada, in and for the COUNTY OF CLARK; and The Honorable Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge, Respondents, and The State of Nevada, Real Party in Interest.

Brandon Richard Cecil Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney


Brandon Richard Cecil

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a proper person petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner seeks an order compelling the district court to award him presentence credit. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. Petitioner's request constitutes a challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction and sentence, which must be raised in a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.724(2)(b) ; NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, we

We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.

ORDER the petition DENIED.


Summaries of

Cecil v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 15, 2011
373 P.3d 902 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Cecil v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Case Details

Full title:Brandon Richard CECIL, Petitioner, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Jul 15, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 902 (Nev. 2011)