From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cecil v. City of Jacksonville

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 19, 1991
800 P.2d 1090 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

LUBA 90-013; CA A66579

Submitted on record and briefs November 1, 1990.

Motions to dismiss and to strike denied; affirmed December 5, 1990, Reconsideration denied January 30, 1991. Petition for review denied February 19, 1991 ( 311 Or. 166)

Judicial Review from Land Use Board of Appeals.

Carlyle F. Stout III, Medford, filed the brief for petitioners.

Robert R. Cecil, Jacksonville, filed the brief pro se.

No appearance for respondents Mariette Marmillod and Robert Prestegaard.

Martial E. Henault, Medford, filed the brief for respondent City of Jacksonville.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Motions to dismiss and to strike denied; affirmed.


Petitioners seek review of a LUBA decision. Respondent city has moved to dismiss the petition and, alternatively, to strike petitioners' assignments of error. The motions are denied.

On the merits, we affirm without discussion.

Motions to dismiss and to strike denied; affirmed.


Summaries of

Cecil v. City of Jacksonville

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 19, 1991
800 P.2d 1090 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Cecil v. City of Jacksonville

Case Details

Full title:Robert R. CECIL, Mariette Marmillod and Robert Prestegaard, Respondents…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 19, 1991

Citations

800 P.2d 1090 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
800 P.2d 1090