From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ceasar v. Allison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 5, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0392 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0392 JAM GGH P

10-05-2011

WALTER DANNY CEASAR, III, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has timely filed a notice of appeal of this court's dismissal of his application for a writ of habeas corpus, filed on August 10, 2011. Before petitioner can appeal this decision, a certificate of appealability must issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).

A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 "only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The court must either issue a certificate of appealability indicating which issues satisfy the required showing or must state the reasons why such a certificate should not issue. Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).

For the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations, filed on June 9, 2011, petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability should not issue in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

John A. Mendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ceasar v. Allison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 5, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0392 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Ceasar v. Allison

Case Details

Full title:WALTER DANNY CEASAR, III, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0392 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)