holding that trial judges are given broad discretion in determining the scope of cross-examination and allowing the government to cross-examine witness regarding alleged participation in a prior fraudulent real estate scheme
Summary of this case from Boykin v. W. Express, Inc.No. 15–718.
01-11-2016
Cassandra CEAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
holding that trial judges are given broad discretion in determining the scope of cross-examination and allowing the government to cross-examine witness regarding alleged participation in a prior fraudulent real estate scheme
Summary of this case from Boykin v. W. Express, Inc.Full title:Cassandra CEAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: Jan 11, 2016
See also United States v. Browne, 621 F. App'x 44, 47 (2d Cir. 2015) cert. denied sub nom. Cean v. United…