From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CDX Holdings, Inc. v. Heddon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jun 21, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-126-N (N.D. Tex. Jun. 21, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-126-N

06-21-2012

CDX HOLDINGS, INC. AND CARIS DIAGNOSTICS, INC. Plaintiff, v. DAVID HEDDON, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, the Motion for Preliminary Injunction, filed by CDX Holdings, Inc., Caris Diagnostics, Inc., filed January 13, 2012, is DENIED.

_________________

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

CDX Holdings, Inc. v. Heddon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jun 21, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-126-N (N.D. Tex. Jun. 21, 2012)
Case details for

CDX Holdings, Inc. v. Heddon

Case Details

Full title:CDX HOLDINGS, INC. AND CARIS DIAGNOSTICS, INC. Plaintiff, v. DAVID HEDDON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jun 21, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-126-N (N.D. Tex. Jun. 21, 2012)