From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CDR Marketing, Inc. v. Chopin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 6, 1991
573 So. 2d 450 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 89-2873.

February 6, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County; Richard I. Wennet, Judge.

H. Bryant Sims, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

William E. Corley, III of Cadwalader, Wickersham Taft, Palm Beach, for appellees.


We reverse on the authority of Commonwealth Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 1990). Because the trial court's written order failed to contain an express finding that the defendant's repeated failure to comply with discovery orders was willful, we remand for reconsideration of this issue. As the Florida Supreme Court said in Tubero, by insisting upon a finding of willfulness or its equivalent, there will be the added assurance that the trial judge has made a conscious determination that the noncompliance was more than mere neglect and inadvertence.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., (Retired) Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

CDR Marketing, Inc. v. Chopin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 6, 1991
573 So. 2d 450 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

CDR Marketing, Inc. v. Chopin

Case Details

Full title:CDR MARKETING, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION AND BRITTANY PGA, INC., A…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 6, 1991

Citations

573 So. 2d 450 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Thermal Dynamics, Inc.

First, in order to dismiss a cause for noncompliance with discovery, a trial judge must issue an express…