C.C. v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. H. A. M. v. State

    83 So. 3d 577 (Ala. Crim. App. 2011)   Cited 1 times

    Furthermore, the transferring court may rely solely on its independent determination of the juvenile's mental state. C.C. v. State, 586 So.2d 1018(Ala.Crim.App.), on return to remand, 591 So.2d 156 (Ala.Crim.App.1991). Even if one or more of the statutory factors supports keeping the child in the juvenile system, the juvenile court may transfer the child for prosecution as an adult if the remaining factors provide clear and convincing evidence supporting the transfer.

  2. H.A.M. v. State

    No. CR-09-1517 (Ala. Crim. App. Apr. 29, 2011)

    Furthermore, the transferring court may rely solely on its independent determination of the juvenile's mental state. C.C. v. State, 586 So. 2d 1018 (Ala. Crim. App.), on return to remand, 591 So. 2d 156 (Ala. Crim. App. 1991). Even if one or more of the statutory factors supports keeping the child in the juvenile system, the juvenile court may transfer the child for prosecution as an adult if the remaining factors provide clear and convincing evidence supporting the transfer.

  3. Smith v. State

    795 So. 2d 788 (Ala. Crim. App. 2000)   Cited 98 times
    Holding that even if the statement of capital-murder defendant's mother about the defendant's washing clothes in his mother's trailer was hearsay, it was cumulative of other evidence presented through the defendant's own admissions to police, and, thus, the admission of the statement was not plain error

    Rule 45A, Ala.R.App.P. We have stated that telling a suspect that he has been implicated in a crime is not coercive. C.C. v. State, 586 So.2d 1018 (Ala.Cr.App.), on remand, 591 So.2d 156 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991). "Confronting a defendant with evidence of guilt is not coercion on the part of police and does not render a subsequent confession involuntary."