From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

C&C Jewelry Mfg. Inc. v. West

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 28, 2011
Case No. 5:09-cv-01303-JF (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 5:09-cv-01303-JF

11-28-2011

C&C JEWELRY MANUFACTURING, INC., Plaintiff, v. TRENT WEST, Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.


ORDER VACATING ORDER OF

DISMISSAL, AND DIRECTING THAT CASE

BE REOPENED AND REASSIGNED TO

JUDGE EDWARD DAVILA

[re: dkt. entry 244]

On July 28, 2011, the Court dismissed this action after being informed that the parties had reached a settlement. The dismissal order provided that "if any party notifies the Court within ninety days of the date of this order that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered, this order will be vacated and the case will be restored to the calendar to be set for trial." On October 25, 2011, Defendant-Counterclaimant Trent West filed a notice that the agreed upon consideration had not been delivered, and he requested that the Court vacate the order of dismissal.

Good cause therefor appearing, the order of dismissal (dkt entry 243) is hereby VACATED. The Clerk shall reopen the case and reassign it to District Judge Edward Davila, the judge assigned to the related cases 5:07-cv-01812-EJD and 5:10-cv-03124-EJD.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge


Summaries of

C&C Jewelry Mfg. Inc. v. West

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 28, 2011
Case No. 5:09-cv-01303-JF (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2011)
Case details for

C&C Jewelry Mfg. Inc. v. West

Case Details

Full title:C&C JEWELRY MANUFACTURING, INC., Plaintiff, v. TRENT WEST, Defendant. AND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 28, 2011

Citations

Case No. 5:09-cv-01303-JF (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2011)