See, e.g., Shull v. Wells (In re Wells), 2010 WL 6259961, at *3 (Mem. Dec.) (9th Cir. BAP Dec. 2, 2010)(citing cases); Johnson v. Safarian (In re Safarian), 2010 WL 6259763, at *5 (Mem. Dec.) (9th Cir. BAP Apr. 13, 2010) (same). Simply put, the bankruptcy court correctly dismissed Saxena's nondischargeability complaint as untimely filed.
See, e.g., Shull v. Wells (In re Wells), 2010 WL 6259961, at *3 (Mem. Dec.) (9th Cir. BAP Dec. 2, 2010)(citing cases); Johnson v. Safarian (In re Safarian), 2010 WL 6259763, at *5 (Mem. Dec.) (9th Cir. BAP Apr. 13, 2010) (same). Simply put, the bankruptcy court correctly dismissed Saxena's nondischargeability complaint as untimely filed.
In those decisions, the Ninth Circuit instructs: The bankruptcy court also pointed out that the Rule 4007(c) legal landscape had changed based upon two BAP decisions: Johnson v. Safarian (In re Safarian), 2010 WL 6259763 at *6 and n.13 (9th Cir. BAP April 13, 2010); Herndon v. de la Cruz (In re de la Cruz), 176 B.R. 19, 24 (9th Cir. BAP 1994). Memorandum on Remand at 11.