In re Safarian

3 Citing cases

  1. Saxena v. Abud (In re Abud)

    BAP No. CC-14-1444-KuPeTa (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Sep. 3, 2015)

    See, e.g., Shull v. Wells (In re Wells), 2010 WL 6259961, at *3 (Mem. Dec.) (9th Cir. BAP Dec. 2, 2010)(citing cases); Johnson v. Safarian (In re Safarian), 2010 WL 6259763, at *5 (Mem. Dec.) (9th Cir. BAP Apr. 13, 2010) (same). Simply put, the bankruptcy court correctly dismissed Saxena's nondischargeability complaint as untimely filed.

  2. In re Abud

    BAP CC-14-1444-KuPeTa (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Sep. 3, 2015)

    See, e.g., Shull v. Wells (In re Wells), 2010 WL 6259961, at *3 (Mem. Dec.) (9th Cir. BAP Dec. 2, 2010)(citing cases); Johnson v. Safarian (In re Safarian), 2010 WL 6259763, at *5 (Mem. Dec.) (9th Cir. BAP Apr. 13, 2010) (same). Simply put, the bankruptcy court correctly dismissed Saxena's nondischargeability complaint as untimely filed.

  3. Bustos v. Molasky (In re Molasky)

    BAP No. NV-14-1109-PaJuHl (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Oct. 20, 2014)

    In those decisions, the Ninth Circuit instructs: The bankruptcy court also pointed out that the Rule 4007(c) legal landscape had changed based upon two BAP decisions: Johnson v. Safarian (In re Safarian), 2010 WL 6259763 at *6 and n.13 (9th Cir. BAP April 13, 2010); Herndon v. de la Cruz (In re de la Cruz), 176 B.R. 19, 24 (9th Cir. BAP 1994). Memorandum on Remand at 11.