C.B. v. Sabalos ex rel. County of Pima

Full title: C.B., Patient "1," Patient "2," Patient "3," Patient "4," non-party…

Court: Court of Appeals of Arizona, Second Division, Department B

Date published: Jun 13, 2000

198 Ariz. 115 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000)

198 Ariz. 115

Opinion

7 P.3d 124 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 2000) 198 Ariz. 115 C.B., Patient "1," Patient "2," Patient "3," Patient "4," non-party patients, Petitioners, v. Hon. Charles SABALOS, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF PIMA, Respondent, and Jane Roe, an individual woman; Sandra Mattson, Ph.D., a single woman; Donald Garland, M.D., and Dawn Garland, husband and wife; Wesley McEldon, a single man; Edward Gentile and Deborah Gentile, husband and wife; Hospital Corporation of America dba Sonora Desert Hospital; and Charter Hospital Of Tucson, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Real Parties in Interest. Donald Garland, M.D., and Dawn Garland, husband and wife, Petitioners, v. Hon. Charles Sabalos, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, In and For the County of Pima, Respondent, Jane Roe, an individual woman; Sandra Mattson, Ph.D., a single woman; Wesley McEldon, a single man; Edward Gentile and Deborah Gentile, husband and wife; Hospital Corporation of America dba Sonora Desert Hospital; and Charter Hospital of Tucson, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Real Parties in Interest. Sandra Mattson, Ph.D., a single woman, Petitioner, v. Hon. Charles Sabalos, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, In and For the County of Pima, Respondent, and Jane Roe, an individual woman; Donald Garland, M.D., and Dawn Garland, husband and wife; Wesley McEldon, a single man; Edward Gentile and Deborah Gentile, husband and wife; Hospital Corporation of America dba Sonora Desert Hospital; and Charter Hospital Of Tucson, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Real Parties in Interest. Nos. 2 CA-SA 00-0048, 2 CA-SA 00-0049, 2 CA-SA 00-0053. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Second Division, Department B. June 13, 2000.

        Editorial Note:

        This opinion was cited at 7 P.3d 124-128 of the advance sheets but the court withdrew their opinion due to review was denied and was order not to published, December 7, 2000.