We reverse the summary judgment and remand this case for a trial on the issue of damages because disputed issues of material fact exist as to whether appellant took possession of the premises after evicting appellees for its own account or for the account of the tenant. See CB Institutional Fund VIII v. Gemballa U.S.A., Inc., 566 So.2d 896, 897 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Geiger Mut. Agency, Inc. v. Wright, 233 So.2d 444, 447 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970); Williamsv. Aeroland Oil Co., 155 Fla. 114, 20 So.2d 346 (1944). REVERSED and REMANDED.
That part of the award was for future rental installments under the lease less the amount due from the reletting. See Kanter v. Safran, 99 So.2d 706, 707 (Fla. 1958); see generally Williams v. Aeroland Oil Co., 155 Fla. 114, 20 So.2d 346 (1944); CB Institutional Fund VIII v. Gemballa U.S.A., Inc., 566 So.2d 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). This court has said: