From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cazares v. Sullivan

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 24, 2006
No. CIV S-05-0625 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0625 FCD DAD P.

February 24, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 12, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 12, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Respondents' motion to dismiss, filed on August 5, 2005, is denied as moot.


Summaries of

Cazares v. Sullivan

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 24, 2006
No. CIV S-05-0625 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2006)
Case details for

Cazares v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:RENE CAZARES, Petitioner, v. W.J. SULLIVAN, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 24, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-0625 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2006)