From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caymitte v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 31, 2004
868 So. 2d 681 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Summary

reversing summary denial of defendant’s rule 3.853 motion where the motion was legally sufficient and warranted an evidentiary hearing to determine if DNA evidence existed

Summary of this case from Merritt v. State

Opinion

Case No. 4D03-4313.

Opinion filed March 31, 2004.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Dale Ross, Judge, L.T. Case No. 90-25204 CF10A.

Jean Gerard Caymitte, Miami, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Claudine M. LaFrance, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Jean Gerard Caymitte appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction DNA testing filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. We reverse and remand for further proceedings upon finding Caymitte's motion legally sufficient and warranting a hearing to determine if DNA evidence existed. Hitchcock v. State, 29 Fla. L. Weekly S13 (Fla. Jan. 15, 2004); Zollman v. State, 854 So.2d 775 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

STONE, KLEIN and MAY, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL DISPOSITION OF ANY TIMELY FILED MOTION FOR REHEARING.


Summaries of

Caymitte v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 31, 2004
868 So. 2d 681 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

reversing summary denial of defendant’s rule 3.853 motion where the motion was legally sufficient and warranted an evidentiary hearing to determine if DNA evidence existed

Summary of this case from Merritt v. State
Case details for

Caymitte v. State

Case Details

Full title:JEAN GERARD CAYMITTE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 31, 2004

Citations

868 So. 2d 681 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Merritt v. State

The state concedes the defendant’s identified factual questions as to what evidence remains for DNA testing…

Goodwin v. State

We reverse and remand for the trial court to entertain Goodwin's motion on its merits, as we find the motion…