Opinion
3:11-cv-00565-HDM-VPC
03-19-2013
SHAWN CAWLEY, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER GOOD, et. al., Defendants.
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTES OF THE COURT
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is defendant Good's motion to strike (#37). Plaintiff opposed (#38). Defendant did not reply. Defendant Good asks the court to strike plaintiff's response and objection to defendant's reply in support of his motion for summary judgment ("supplemental brief") (#36) on the grounds that this document does not comport with Local Rule ("LR") 7-2.
Refers to the court's docket numbers.
LR 7-2 provides for the filing of a motion, an opposition, and a reply. LR 7-2 does not provide for the filing of supplemental briefs, and plaintiff did not seek leave of the court to file a supplemental brief.
Accordingly, plaintiff's supplemental brief is a rogue document. Defendant's motion to strike (#37) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff's supplemental brief (#36) is hereby STRICKEN.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By: ____________________________
Deputy Clerk