Opinion
Civil Action No. 04-cv-01849-MSK-MEH.
February 27, 2006
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL, AS MOOT
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's motion (#290) requesting leave to substitute counsel. D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.3 does not authorize the substitution of counsel. Nevertheless, the Court has already granted Plaintiff's prior counsel leave to withdraw effective February 27, 2006. Because new counsel has filed an entry of appearance, no further relief is required.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion (#290) is DENIED, as moot.