From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caves v. Mills Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1928
142 S.E. 220 (N.C. 1928)

Opinion

(Filed 28 March, 1928.)

Negligence — Acts or Omissions Constitute Negligence in General.

An action to recover damages for a negligent injury will be dismissed when the evidence discloses that it resulted from an accident from an unknown cause or a known cause which could not have been reasonably anticipated.

APPEAL by plaintiff from Bond, J., at December Term, 1927, of ROBESON. Affirmed.

Britt Britt and Charles R. Britt for plaintiff.

Varser, Lawrence, Proctor McIntyre for defendant.


The plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for personal injury alleged to have been caused by the defendant's negligence. He alleged that while engaged in marking the name of a purchaser on bundles of cloth he was injured by the falling on his left leg of a bale which had negligently been stored on its round end. At the close of the evidence the action was dismissed as in case of nonsuit. The testimony discloses an alleged injury resulting from an accident — an event proceeding from an unknown cause or an unusual and unexpected event from a known cause. The judgment is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Caves v. Mills Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1928
142 S.E. 220 (N.C. 1928)
Case details for

Caves v. Mills Company

Case Details

Full title:T. L. CAVES v. ERWIN COTTON MILLS COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 1928

Citations

142 S.E. 220 (N.C. 1928)
142 S.E. 220