From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cavalry SPV I, LLC v. Frenkel

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 16, 2014
119 A.D.3d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-07-16

CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, respondent, v. Ernest J. FRENKEL, appellant.


Menashe & Associates, LLP, Montebello. N.Y. (Chezki Menashe of counsel), for appellant.

In an action to recover damages for breach of a credit card agreement, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), entered March 11, 2013, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1) to vacate a judgment of the same court dated January 8, 2013, entered in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the total sum of $13,226.59, upon his failure to appear or answer the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A party seeking to vacate a default pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1) must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his or her delay in appearing and answering the complaint and a potentially meritorious defense to the action ( see Citibank [S. D.], N.A. v. Baron, 115 A.D.3d 901, 982 N.Y.S.2d 396;U.S. Bank N.A. v. Slavinski, 78 A.D.3d 1167, 912 N.Y.S.2d 285;O'Donnell v. Frangakis, 76 A.D.3d 999, 1000, 908 N.Y.S.2d 589;Katz v. Marra, 74 A.D.3d 888, 890, 905 N.Y.S.2d 204;Cavalry Portfolio Servs., LLC v. Reisman, 55 A.D.3d 524, 865 N.Y.S.2d 286).

Here, the defendant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his default. In view of the lack of a reasonable excuse, it is unnecessary to consider whether the defendant sufficiently demonstrated the existence of a potentially meritorious defense ( see Centennial El. Indus., Inc. v. Ninety–Five Madison Corp., 90 A.D.3d 689, 690, 934 N.Y.S.2d 483;O'Donnell v. Frangakis, 76 A.D.3d at 1000, 908 N.Y.S.2d 589).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion to vacate the default judgment. BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MALTESE and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cavalry SPV I, LLC v. Frenkel

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 16, 2014
119 A.D.3d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Cavalry SPV I, LLC v. Frenkel

Case Details

Full title:CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, respondent, v. Ernest J. FRENKEL, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 16, 2014

Citations

119 A.D.3d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
119 A.D.3d 724
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 5295

Citing Cases

Cervini v. Cisco Gen. Constr., Inc.

Here, the defendant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its default (see Abdelqader v. Abdelqader,…

Paulus v. Christopher Vacirca, Inc.

Thus, the appellant's claim that he was not required to serve an answer until after an amended complaint had…