From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cavalcante v. Lockheed Electronics Co.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Feb 1, 1966
90 N.J. Super. 243 (App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

Argued January 24, 1966 —

Decided February 1, 1966.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

Mr. Gerald W. Conway argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster Demos, attorneys; Mr. John C. Demos, of counsel).

Mr. Thomas E. O'Gorman argued the cause for respondent.


Respondent appeals from an award of compensation entered in the County Court reported at 85 N.J. Super. 230 (1964), affirming a similar award in the Workmen's Compensation Division.

Paraphrasing the conclusion of the trial court, we are of the opinion that it was reasonable for this employee, sent to a distant place by his employer for an indeterminate number of days to perform emergent duties with the greatest possible dispatch, to seek some physical relaxation during the period of his intensive work; that his activities in this regard were of themselves not unreasonable; and therefore that the accident in which he was involved, resulting in his death, arose out of and in the course of his employment.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Cavalcante v. Lockheed Electronics Co.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Feb 1, 1966
90 N.J. Super. 243 (App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Cavalcante v. Lockheed Electronics Co.

Case Details

Full title:ANGELA ANN CAVALCANTE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. LOCKHEED ELECTRONICS…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Feb 1, 1966

Citations

90 N.J. Super. 243 (App. Div. 1966)
217 A.2d 140

Citing Cases

Ohio Cas. Group v. Aetna Cas. Sur. Co.

THE COMPENSATION JUDGE'S DECISION In considering whether the accident was one "arising out of and in the…

Yorkin v. Volvo Distributing Co.

In this we think he erred. Cavalcante v. Lockheed Electronics Co., 85 N.J. Super. 320 (Law Div. 1964), aff'd…