From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caulton v. Smith

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
May 16, 2007
CASE NO. 04-CV-74814-DT (E.D. Mich. May. 16, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 04-CV-74814-DT.

May 16, 2007


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL AND DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL


Petitioner has appealed the Court's opinion and judgment denying his habeas corpus petition. Currently pending are Petitioner's motions for appointment of counsel and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

The Court has already denied Petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability. Because the issues presented on appeal are not adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further, Miller-el v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003), the motion for appointment of counsel [dkt. #39, May 2, 2007] is DENIED.

Petitioner may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal without further authorization because he was granted in forma pauperis in the District Court. Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(3). Accordingly, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis [dkt. #38, May 2, 2007] is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Caulton v. Smith

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
May 16, 2007
CASE NO. 04-CV-74814-DT (E.D. Mich. May. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Caulton v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN CAULTON, Petitioner, v. WILLIE SMITH, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: May 16, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 04-CV-74814-DT (E.D. Mich. May. 16, 2007)