From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cauhn et al. v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Jul 18, 1929
122 So. 565 (Fla. 1929)

Opinion

Opinion filed July 18, 1929.

A Writ of Error to the Criminal Court of Record for Hillsborough County; W. Raleigh Petteway, Judge.

Writ of Error quashed.

Edwin R. Dickenson and Zewadski Pierce, for Plaintiffs in Error;

Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for the State.


In this case it becomes necessary for us to quash the writ of error and remand the cause because there appears in the record no judgment of conviction.

The defendants were tried upon an information filed in the Criminal Court of Record in and for Hillsborough County. They were convicted by the jury and were sentenced to serve five years each in the State prison. The sentence was not upon a judgment of conviction pronounced by the court, without which the sentence is void. See Smith v. State, 75 Fla. 478, 78 So. R. 530; Johnson v. State, 81 Fla. 783, 89 So. R. 114; Harris v. State, 75 Fla. 527, 78 So. R. 526; Norwood v. State, 80 Fla. 613, 86 So. R. 506; Timmons v. State, decided January, 1929, reported 119 S. 393.

It is therefore the judgment of this Court that the writ of error be quashed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Quashed and remanded.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND STRUM, J., concur.

TERRELL, C. J., AND ELLIS AND BROWN, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.


Summaries of

Cauhn et al. v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Jul 18, 1929
122 So. 565 (Fla. 1929)
Case details for

Cauhn et al. v. State

Case Details

Full title:NEOMA CAUHN, alias JANE DOE, alias NAOMI KUHN, MADELINE NELSON and JOE…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Jul 18, 1929

Citations

122 So. 565 (Fla. 1929)
122 So. 565

Citing Cases

Maxey v. Manning

November 23, 1953.Mr. Russell B. Maxey, of Columbia, Appellant, pro se, cites: As to the writ of habeas…

Ingram v. State

The sentence imposed is not supported by a proper adjudication of the defendant's guilt. Therefore under the…