From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cato v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 7, 1993
860 S.W.2d 400 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 63414.

September 7, 1993.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY; ARTHUR LITZ, JUDGE.

Elizabeth Haines, St. Louis, for movant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.


ORDER


Movant, Nathaniel Cato, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgments of conviction which movant sought to vacate were for sixteen counts of robbery in the first degree and thirteen counts of armed criminal action. Movant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to concurrent terms of imprisonment of twenty-five years on each count.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Cato v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 7, 1993
860 S.W.2d 400 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Cato v. State

Case Details

Full title:NATHANIEL CATO, MOVANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Sep 7, 1993

Citations

860 S.W.2d 400 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)