From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cato v. Reed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 10, 2021
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 62981 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

OP 21-00126

03-10-2021

IN THE MATTER OF JASON E.T. CATO, PETITIONER, v. HON. FREDERICK G. REED, ONTARIO COUNTY COURT JUDGE, RESPONDENT.


PRESENT:

Petitioner having moved for permission to commence by order to show cause and to proceed as a poor person on an original CPLR article 78 proceeding, and petitioner having moved for other relief,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is denied insofar as it seeks poor person relief on the ground that the facts as set forth by petitioner fail to demonstrate merit to the proceeding, and

It is further ORDERED that the petition is dismissed unless the requisite filing fee is paid within 120 days (see CPLR 1101 [d]), and

It is further ORDERED that the motion is denied insofar as it seeks other relief.

Entered: March 10, 2021

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Cato v. Reed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 10, 2021
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 62981 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Cato v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JASON E.T. CATO, PETITIONER, v. HON. FREDERICK G. REED…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 10, 2021

Citations

2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 62981 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)