From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CATO v. JONES

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 23, 2008
No. CIV S-08-1289 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-1289 KJM P.

June 23, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.


Summaries of

CATO v. JONES

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 23, 2008
No. CIV S-08-1289 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2008)
Case details for

CATO v. JONES

Case Details

Full title:RODOLFO MENDEZ CATO, Petitioner, v. SCOTT JONES, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 23, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-08-1289 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2008)

Citing Cases

Dumas v. Easley

It is significant that, in spite of the allegation contained in plaintiffs' petition that no consideration…