From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cato v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 9, 2021
20-CV-10934 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 2021)

Opinion

20-CV-10934 (RA)

11-09-2021

NICOLE CATO, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cato v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 9, 2021
20-CV-10934 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Cato v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:NICOLE CATO, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 9, 2021

Citations

20-CV-10934 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 2021)