From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CATO v. CAREY

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 30, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0718 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0718 FCD KJM P.

May 30, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file and serve an opposition to defendants' May 2, 2008 motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time (docket no. 19) is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted sixty days from the date of this order in which to file and serve an opposition to defendants' May 2, 2008 motion to dismiss. Defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed twenty days thereafter.


Summaries of

CATO v. CAREY

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 30, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0718 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2008)
Case details for

CATO v. CAREY

Case Details

Full title:RODOLFO MENDEZ CATO, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS L. CAREY, Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 30, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0718 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2008)