From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Catholic v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 23, 1994
632 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-2814.

February 23, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Stanton S. Kaplan, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joan Fowler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


As a special condition of probation appellant agreed to submit to urinalysis, breathalyzer or blood tests when requested; however, the written order of probation additionally requires appellant to pay for those tests, a condition not mentioned at the sentencing hearing. This was error. Cumbie v. State, 597 So.2d 946 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). We therefore reverse the order of probation solely for deletion of the requirement that the appellant pay for such tests. The judgment and sentence are otherwise affirmed.

DELL, C.J., and KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Catholic v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 23, 1994
632 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Catholic v. State

Case Details

Full title:PERCY CATHOLIC, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 23, 1994

Citations

632 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Sanford v. State

See § 948.03(1)(k)1; Dean. For this reason the requirement that defendant pay the cost of testing as a…

Reiter v. State

However, the portion of condition 12 which requires Reiter to pay for such tests was not mentioned at the…