From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Catholic Family Center v. Doe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1989
147 A.D.2d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

February 3, 1989

Appeal from the Monroe County Family Court, Maas J.

Present — Denman, J.P., Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs (see, Matter of Catholic Charities v Barber, 109 Misc.2d 25, affd 84 A.D.2d 966). Memorandum: We add only that appellants' contentions that the provisions of the Social Services Law as here applied violate their equal protection and due process rights under either the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of this State were not raised in the Family Court and thus have not been preserved for appellate review (see, Tumolillo v Tumolillo, 51 N.Y.2d 790; Arvantides v Arvantides, 106 A.D.2d 853, mod 64 N.Y.2d 1033; City of Rochester v Chiarella, 86 A.D.2d 110, affd 58 N.Y.2d 316; Marine Midland Bank-Central v Gleason, 62 A.D.2d 429 [4th Dept 1978], affd 47 N.Y.2d 758; 4 N.Y. Jur 2d, Appellate Review, § 117, at 187).


Summaries of

Catholic Family Center v. Doe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1989
147 A.D.2d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Catholic Family Center v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:CATHOLIC FAMILY CENTER, an Agency of the Catholic Charities of the Diocese…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1989

Citations

147 A.D.2d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
537 N.Y.S.2d 720

Citing Cases

Meyers v. Berl

ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (seeMatter of Laborers…

Impulse Chiro. v. N.Y. Cent. Mut. Fire

Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was properly granted, as defendant failed to raise a…