From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Catherwood v. American Sterilizer Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 10, 1987
132 A.D.2d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

July 10, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We conclude that plaintiff's failure to serve the complaint until nine days after it was due was not law office failure under the circumstances of this case (cf., Kel Mgt. Corp. v. Rogers Wells, 64 N.Y.2d 904, 905). Consequently, there being a sufficient indication of merit and no prejudice to defendant, it was not an abuse of discretion for Special Term to deny the motion to dismiss the complaint (see, Donnelly v. Pepicelli, 58 N.Y.2d 268; Barasch v. Micucci, 49 N.Y.2d 594, 600).


Summaries of

Catherwood v. American Sterilizer Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 10, 1987
132 A.D.2d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Catherwood v. American Sterilizer Company

Case Details

Full title:ELAINE CATHERWOOD et al., Respondents, v. AMERICAN STERILIZER COMPANY et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 10, 1987

Citations

132 A.D.2d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)