From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Catherina Park v. 27 Wash. Sq. N. Owners LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 19, 2019
177 A.D.3d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

10365 Index 156500/17

11-19-2019

Catherina PARK, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. 27 WASHINGTON SQ. NORTH OWNERS LLC, Defendant–Respondent.

Sokolski & Zekaria, P.C., New York (Mark Davies of counsel), for appellants. Rosenberg & Estis, P.C., New York (Deborah E. Riegel of counsel), for respondent.


Sokolski & Zekaria, P.C., New York (Mark Davies of counsel), for appellants.

Rosenberg & Estis, P.C., New York (Deborah E. Riegel of counsel), for respondent.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Tom, Kapnick, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered January 8, 2018, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to plaintiffs' contention, the rent regulatory status of their apartment was litigated and decided in a prior proceeding (see Matter of Park v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 150 A.D.3d 105, 50 N.Y.S.3d 377 [1st Dept. 2017] ).


Summaries of

Catherina Park v. 27 Wash. Sq. N. Owners LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 19, 2019
177 A.D.3d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Catherina Park v. 27 Wash. Sq. N. Owners LLC

Case Details

Full title:Catherina Park, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. 27 Washington Sq. North…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 19, 2019

Citations

177 A.D.3d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 8361
110 N.Y.S.3d 543