Opinion
2:17-cv-01080-GMN-PAL
04-21-2023
TINA CATES, Plaintiff, v. BRUCE D. STROUD, et al., Defendants.
Travis N. Barrick, #9257 Gallian Welker & Associates, L.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff Tina Cates D.Randall Gilmer, Esq. Chief Deputy Attorney General Nevada Attorney General's Office Attorneys for Respondents
Travis N. Barrick, #9257 Gallian Welker & Associates, L.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff Tina Cates
D.Randall Gilmer, Esq. Chief Deputy Attorney General Nevada Attorney General's Office Attorneys for Respondents
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Plaintiff Tina Cates (“Ms. Cates”), through her attorneys of the law firm of Gallian Welker & Associates, L.C., and Defendants, through their attorneys at the Office of Attorney General hereby submit this Stipulation for Extension of Time.
In support thereof, they state the following:
On 3/1/23, Ms. Cates filed her Rule 60(b) Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 49).
On 3/7/23, counsel for the parties submitted their Stipulation for Extension of Time of 30 days for the Defendants to submit their Response, (ECF No. 51) whereby their Response became due on 4/15/23.
On 4/15/23, the Defendants filed their Response (ECF No.), whereby Ms. Cates' Reply became due on 4/22, 23.
Out of consideration of each other's caseload, counsel for the parties have agreed that a 14-day extension for Ms. Cates' to file her Reply would produce no prejudice to either party and allow Mr. Barrick to provide full briefing on complicated arguments raised in Defendants' Response. Ms. Cates' Reply would become due on 5/5/23.
IT IS SO ORDERED.