From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CATE v. McGRATH

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 14, 2005
02:99-cv-1466-GEB-JFM-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2005)

Opinion

02:99-cv-1466-GEB-JFM-P.

October 14, 2005


ORDER


On October 5, 2005, Defendants filed a "Request for Reconsideration by the District Court of Magistrate Judge's Ruling." The Magistrate Judge's ruling to be reconsidered was filed September 22, 2005. Plaintiff did not file an opposition to Defendants' request.

A magistrate judge's ruling shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." L.R. 72-303(f). The Magistrate Judge's ruling to expand the record to include the report of Dr. Joan Gerbasi is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore, the ruling is affirmed.


Summaries of

CATE v. McGRATH

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 14, 2005
02:99-cv-1466-GEB-JFM-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2005)
Case details for

CATE v. McGRATH

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE ROBERT CATE, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH McGRATH, Warden; and JEANNE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 14, 2005

Citations

02:99-cv-1466-GEB-JFM-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2005)