From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Catanzaro v. Carr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 1, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-CV-14554 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 1, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-CV-14554

09-01-2011

MATTHEW CATANZARO, Plaintiff, v. CARR, et al., Defendants.


DISTRICT JUDGE NANCY G. EDMUNDS

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ADD EXHIBITS TO HIS CROSS-

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 61)

Plaintiff moves for leave to add exhibits to his Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed at docket number 45. (Docket no. 61). The motion is unopposed. All pretrial matters have been referred to the undersigned for action. (Docket no. 10). The Court dispenses with oral argument on the motion pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(f). The Court will grant Plaintiff's motion and will consider the exhibits attached to the present motion relative to Plaintiff's pending Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Add Exhibits to his Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 61) is GRANTED.

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), the parties have a period of fourteen days from the date of this Order within which to file any written appeal to the District Judge as may be permissible under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

MONA K. MAJZOUB

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PROOF OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of this Order was served upon Matthew Catanzaro and Counsel of Record on this date.

Lisa C. Bartlett

Case Manager


Summaries of

Catanzaro v. Carr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 1, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-CV-14554 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Catanzaro v. Carr

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW CATANZARO, Plaintiff, v. CARR, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 1, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-CV-14554 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 1, 2011)