From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Catanese v. Thomson

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 20, 1954
216 F.2d 955 (6th Cir. 1954)

Opinion

Nos. 12016-12018.

October 20, 1954.

Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; Freed, Judge.

Philip Sampliner, Elmer R. Vanek, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellants.

Hugh Wells, and Mooris R. Blane, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.


The above cases coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the findings of fact of the district court were not clearly erroneous, and that the judgments are sustained by substantial evidence, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgments of the district court be and are hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

Catanese v. Thomson

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 20, 1954
216 F.2d 955 (6th Cir. 1954)
Case details for

Catanese v. Thomson

Case Details

Full title:Mary CATANESE and Dominic K. Catanese, Defendants-Appellants, v. Kenneth…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Oct 20, 1954

Citations

216 F.2d 955 (6th Cir. 1954)