From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castro v. Schriro

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jun 1, 2017
29 N.Y.3d 1005 (N.Y. 2017)

Opinion

06-01-2017

In the Matter of Raymond CASTRO, Respondent, v. Dora SCHRIRO, & c., et al. Appellants.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Ingrid R. Gustafson, Richard Dearing and Claude S. Platton of counsel), for appellants. Koehler & Isaacs LLP, New York City (Liam L. Castro of counsel), for respondent.


Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Ingrid R. Gustafson, Richard Dearing and Claude S. Platton of counsel), for appellants.

Koehler & Isaacs LLP, New York City (Liam L. Castro of counsel), for respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 ), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. Under the circumstances presented, the Appellate Division correctly held that the petition stated a claim for improper termination.

Chief Judge DiFIORE and Judges RIVERA, STEIN, FAHEY, GARCIA and WILSON concur.


Summaries of

Castro v. Schriro

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jun 1, 2017
29 N.Y.3d 1005 (N.Y. 2017)
Case details for

Castro v. Schriro

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Raymond CASTRO, Respondent, v. Dora SCHRIRO, & c., et al…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Jun 1, 2017

Citations

29 N.Y.3d 1005 (N.Y. 2017)
54 N.Y.S.3d 641
77 N.E.3d 359

Citing Cases

Coa v. Molina

The following facts are drawn from the petition and taken to be true with any ambiguity resolved in favor of…

Starks v. Brann

This court disagrees with respondents that the petition otherwise lacks merit. As stated by the Appellate…