From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castro v. Schriro

Court of Appeals of New York
Jun 1, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 4323 (N.Y. 2017)

Opinion

No. 88 SSM 13

06-01-2017

In the Matter of Raymond Castro, Respondent, v. Dora Schriro, & c., et al. Appellants.

Submitted by Ingrid R. Gustafson, for appellants. Submitted by Liam L. Castro, for respondent.


Submitted by Ingrid R. Gustafson, for appellants.

Submitted by Liam L. Castro, for respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. Under the circumstances presented, the Appellate Division correctly held that the petition stated a claim for improper termination. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur.

Decided June 1, 2017


Summaries of

Castro v. Schriro

Court of Appeals of New York
Jun 1, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 4323 (N.Y. 2017)
Case details for

Castro v. Schriro

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Raymond Castro, Respondent, v. Dora Schriro, & c., et al…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York

Date published: Jun 1, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 4323 (N.Y. 2017)