Opinion
No. 88 SSM 13
06-01-2017
Submitted by Ingrid R. Gustafson, for appellants. Submitted by Liam L. Castro, for respondent.
Submitted by Ingrid R. Gustafson, for appellants.
Submitted by Liam L. Castro, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. Under the circumstances presented, the Appellate Division correctly held that the petition stated a claim for improper termination. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur.
Decided June 1, 2017