From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castro v. Horel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 3, 2011
C09-4902 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2011)

Opinion

C09-4902 WHA

10-03-2011

CARLOS CASTRO, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT A. HOREL, et al., Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A STIPULATED DISMISSAL

Courtroom: 9

Judge: The Honorable William Alsup

Action Filed: October 14, 2009

Defendants Fischer, McKinney, Mount, Horel, Beeson, and Grannis move for a fourteen-day extension of time, up to and including October 17, 2011, in which to file a stipulated dismissal of this case. The Court has read and considered their motion and the accompanying declaration of counsel and, good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' requested extension of time is GRANTED. The time in which the parties may file a stipulated dismissal of this matter is extended up to and including October 17, 2011.

William Alsup

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Castro v. Horel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 3, 2011
C09-4902 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Castro v. Horel

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS CASTRO, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT A. HOREL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 3, 2011

Citations

C09-4902 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2011)