From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castro v. Dretke

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Oct 21, 2005
No. 3:04-cv-0041-R (N.D. Tex. Oct. 21, 2005)

Opinion

No. 3:04-cv-0041-R.

October 21, 2005


ORDER


United States Magistrate Judge Paul Stickney filed Findings, Conclusions and a Recommendation in this case on October 3, 2005. Petitioner, Roberto T. Castro, filed objections to the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in correspondence filed on October 17, 2005. Petitioners grounds for objection are not substantive but merely procedural. Petitioner objects to having to respond to the Findings, Conclusions and a Recommendation within 10 days of receipt since he is unable to obtain legal assistance from a fellow inmate who he claims possesses some of his legal work. (See Pet'rs Corresp. at 1-2).

After reviewing Judge Stickney's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) along with Petitioner's objection to those findings, the Court concludes that Judge Stickney's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are correct and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Castro v. Dretke

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Oct 21, 2005
No. 3:04-cv-0041-R (N.D. Tex. Oct. 21, 2005)
Case details for

Castro v. Dretke

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTO T. CASTRO Petitioner, v. DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director Texas Department…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Oct 21, 2005

Citations

No. 3:04-cv-0041-R (N.D. Tex. Oct. 21, 2005)

Citing Cases

Hicks v. United States

A certificate of appealability (COA) is not needed for a federal inmate to appeal the denial of relief under…